Comparing the various gingiva displacement methods for better dental dental scans

Efficacy of conventional retraction cord and retraction cordless system on using intra oral digital impression an interventional study - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/06/089767

Enrollment

Registered

2025-06-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Retraction Cord (Sure endo

Sure Cord Plus ): The single cord technique will be utilized. The required length of the retraction cord to be positioned, starting from the mesio-buccal interproximal area to the disto-buccal interpr

3M ESPE: The paste to be applied in adequate quantity without exerting any pressure by inserting the end of the capsule tip into the sulcus in a single direction. The material to be left in place for

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants in need of PFM crowns wih good oral hygiene and no clinical attachment loss and no bleeding on probing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants with active periodontal disease and history of systemic disease , pregnancy or lactating women , history of bruxism or parafunctional habits and has large restoration or prostheses interfering the retraction

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Cordless systems may offer superior patient comfort and reduced trauma.Retraction cord may provide better initial displacement but lead to greater tissue rebound. Timepoint: At baseline and post retraction.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
nilTimepoint: nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSarmila

Mar Baselios dental college

byjupaulkurian@mbdc.edu.in9447049455

Outcome results