Skip to content

Comparing Two Laser Treatments and a Regular Method for Cleaning Infected Permanent Teeth

A Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Diode Laser Wavelengths and Conventional Root Canal Disinfection in Pulp Regeneration of Necrotic Immature Permanent Teeth A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089751
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-06-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Laser-Assisted Disinfection - 810 NM: After access opening and pulp extripation, a 810 NM laser with an optical tip 1 mm short of the working length will be used to disinfect the canal.

Sponsors

Dr Priyanka B
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. subjects who come under ASA I for children 2. children of both genders with an age range from 7 to 9 years 3. The tooth in question is in a restorable state 4. Permanent necrotic central incisors with incomplete root development defined by apical foramen size greater than 1 mm 5. young permanent teeth with or without periapical lesion pulp involvement due to trauma selected teeth have never been 6. subjected to any line of endodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. root resorption , ankylosis and root fracture 2. uncooperative patients 3. legal guardians did not consent to participate in the study 4. presence of draining sinus and presence of periodontal pockets, 5. presence of periapical radiolucency more than 10mm measured using DBSWIN software tool

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Radiographic Success Rate will be assessed Root-width/legth ratio, Nollas stage of tooth development, Dentin wall thickness, Root Length, apical diameter, diameter of the periapical radiolucency if present, perforation if presentTimepoint: All the above parameters will be assessed at baseline, 3rd, 6th and 12th months interval using cbct and rvg alternatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the clinical success rate will be assessed Vitality, post operative pain, swelling, tooth discolouration, mobility and tender on percussion.Timepoint: All the above parameters will be assessed at baseline, 3rd, 6th and 12th months interval

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Priyanka B

Chettinad Dental College and Reseach Institute

priyabalu1907@gmail.com8838603094

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026