FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative study of gongs mobilisation versus Mulligan mobilisation on glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in table tennis players

A comparative study of Gongs mobilisation versus Mulligan mobilisation on pain, range of motion and function in table tennis players with Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089722
Enrollment
62
Registered
2025-06-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Gongs Mobilisation: Total Duartion - 30 minutes Frequency - 5 times a week for two weeks HOT pack-10 minutes Gong s mobilisation-The slight pulling of the articular capsule will be mai

Sponsors

Isha Mukund Kulkarni
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Players with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit of 15 degrees or more between dominant and nondominant shoulders Pain in the dominant shoulder while playing NPRS greater than 6 Table tennis players with experience of more than 3 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Previous history of shoulder surgery or significant shoulder injuries within the last 12 months. Presence of neurological disorders or conditions affecting shoulder mobility. Participants undergoing any other treatment . Individuals unable to commit to the intervention schedule

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Numerical Pain Rating Scale for Pain Shoulder range of motion using Goniometer Rowes Score for FunctionTimepoint: At Baeline After 2 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Divya Gohil

Dr DY Patil college of Physiotherapy

divya.gohil@dpu.edu.in7767828290

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026