Skip to content

Gentle Gum Retraction Around Implants: Comparing Two Modern Cordless Techniques

Comparative evaluation of gingival displacement produced by two different cordless retraction systems around dental implant abutments an experimental study - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089599
Enrollment
15
Registered
2025-06-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Magic foam and 3M ESPE: Magic Foam Cord is chemical gingival retraction cord of polyvinyl siloxane intended to produce mechanical retraction due to its own effect on foaming intraoral s

Sponsors

Saloni Rustagi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants were rigorously selected using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure comparable baseline oral health and minimize confounding factors. Healthy individuals aged 18 40 years requiring cement-retained implant prostheses in the posterior mandible or maxilla were included. Eligibility required ideal oral hygiene, indicated by no bleeding on probing, and the presence of adjacent natural teeth for digital scan referencing. Only non-smokers with no history of tobacco use were considered.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria involved patients with submerged implants or those unsuitable for abutment-level impressions. Individuals with periodontal disease such as deep pockets, inflammation, or mobility were excluded to avoid interference with soft tissue evaluation. Those with a thin gingival biotype were also excluded due to higher risk of sulcular trauma. Patients with systemic conditions affecting healing or soft tissue behavior, those unwilling or unable to provide informed consent, or who failed to comply with follow-up protocols were excluded according to study withdrawal guidelines.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of this study is to assess and compare the gingival displacement effectiveness of Magic Foam Cord and 3M ESPE retraction paste around dental implant abutments.Timepoint: Immediately after application of both intervention and after one week.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint:

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSaloni Rustagi

Government Dental College and hospital, Nagpur

drsvw@yahoo.com7972759022

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026