FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing different jaw angles to identify jaw alignment problems in orthodontic patients.

Comparative evaluation of TAU angle and HBN angle with ANB angle for assessing class I and class II skeletal pattern: A cephalometric study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089439
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-06-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Dr K. Sri Kavya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The ANB angle of patients is considered between 1-4 for the Class I skeletal pattern, more than 4 for the Class II pattern. 2. Patients have no missing teeth and have permanent dentition. 3. Patient who had never received any orthodontic treatment. 4. No craniofacial malformations or facial disfigurement. 5. High-quality pretreatment cephalometric radiographs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient who had undergone orthodontic and/or orthognathic surgical treatment 2. Patients with congenital defects and any marked facial Deformity 3. Medically compromised patients.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
compare the TAU angle and HBN angle with ANB angle.Timepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ranganayakulu Inuganti

GSL dental college and hospital

akarsh.ranga@gmail.com9959434440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026