FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative study in the effectiveness of Laproscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane block versus USG guided Erector Spinae Plane block in Laproscopic Upper GI surgeries

A comparative study in the effectiveness of laproscopy guided tap block versus USG guided ESP block in laproscopic upper GI surgeries - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089372
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-06-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system

Interventions

Intervention1: LAPROSCOPIC TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK: PROCEDURE TIME - 10-12 MINUTES DURATION OF ACTION - 12 HOURS Involves injecting local anesthetic in the plane between the transversus ab

Sponsors

Ruby Hall Clinic
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are over 18 years of Age. 2. Patients who have consented to undergo a Surgical and mode of analgesia in lap . General or Gastrointestinal Surgery(Cholecystectomy , hiatal hernia repairs , bariatric surgery ) and who were possessing full Mental Capacity of the events at the Institution. 3. Patients who have been discharged from the institution after undergoing a Surgical procedure at the institution. 4. Patients who have followed up with the Doctors of the institution after the Surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are not Over 18 years of Age. 2. Patients who have not consented to undergo the Procedure at the Institution or did not possess full Mental Capacity of the events. 3.High risk patients , i.e risk of local bleeding , contaminated procedures,unstable physiology. 4. Patients who have not been discharged.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.comparative analysis of the analgesic effectiveness of Laproscopic TAP blocks versus USG-guided ESP blocks 2.Collect patient-reported outcomes to gauge the perceived effectiveness of both techniques in managing postoperative pain. 3.Investigate to reduce the need for opioid analgesics in the postoperative setting. 4.Use findings from the study to propose an optimized, evidence-based analgesia plan for the postoperative periodTimepoint: 1.on data collection completion 2. 6 hours and 12 hours post op 3. 24 hours in Immediate post op period 4 . After completion of sample size—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
3.Investigate the potential for both techniques to reduce the need for opioid analgesics in the postoperative setting. 4.Use findings from the study to propose an optimized, evidence-based analgesia plan for the postoperative period that maximizes pain relief while minimizing opioid consumption. Timepoint: 3. ASSESED AT 6 HOURS TILL TIME OF DISCHARGE 4. END OF STUDY DATA COLLECTION—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKedar Patil

Ruby Hall Clinic

drkedarpatil09@gmail.com9823017515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026