FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing two types of implant hex connections and there effect on crestal bone levels.

Comparative evaluation of crestal bone levels as influenced by two different implant connections- An in-vivo study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089283
Enrollment
22
Registered
2025-06-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Adin touarag S: internal hex implant abutment connection for 6 months Control Intervention1: Adin closefit implant system: conical implant abutment connection fo

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Good oral hygiene Partially edentulous sites Adequate amount of bone width & height

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Parafunctional habits chronic smokers pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
prosthetic rehabilitation of partially edentulous mandibular archTimepoint: 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
crestal bone levelTimepoint: 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Pallavi Sirana

INSTITUTE OF DENTAL STUDIES AND TECHNOLOGIES

dr.pallavisirana@idst.ac.in9582388501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026