comparing the healing and root coverage by Macro surgery versus Microsurgery in treatment of patients with gum recession

A split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Microsurgical vs Traditional macro-surgical Approaches in the Treatment of RT1 and RT2 Gingival Recession Using the Tunneling Technique and amnion membrane A Clinical and Healing Evaluation - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/06/089096

Enrollment

Registered

2025-06-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K055- Other periodontal diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: Microscope aided tunneling technique with amnion membrane for root coverage.: To compare the clinical and healing outcomes between a traditional macrosurgical approach and a more refine

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy individuals aged 18 to 50 years Presence of RT 1 and RT2 gingival recession on the maxillary or mandibular arch No contraindications for periodontal surgery Ability to comply with postoperative instructions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of periodontal disease other than localized gingival recession History of previous periodontal surgery in the affected area Smokers or individuals with a history of smoking within the last 6 months Medications or conditions that could interfere with wound healing

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Change in Gingival Recession (RD and RW): Measured using a periodontal probeTimepoint: baseline,3 and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) Healing index by Landry et al. Pain Levels using a visual analog scale Patient Satisfaction by Likert scale Treatment time ComplicationsTimepoint: Clinical Attachment Level (CAL): Measured at baseline, 3 months, & 6 months. Healing at baseline & 7 days. Pain Levels post-operatively after 7 days. Patient Satisfaction: at 6 months. Treatment time: Baseline Complications:7 days	—

Measure

Time frame

Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) Healing index by Landry et al. Pain Levels using a visual analog scale Patient Satisfaction by Likert scale Treatment time ComplicationsTimepoint: Clinical Attachment Level (CAL): Measured at baseline, 3 months, & 6 months. Healing at baseline & 7 days. Pain Levels post-operatively after 7 days. Patient Satisfaction: at 6 months. Treatment time: Baseline Complications:7 days

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aruna Nautiyal Maithani

dr.arunanautiyal@its.edu.in9845680885

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026