Skip to content

A Comparative Study To Asses The Efficiency Of between The Fingers Grip With The Conventional Pen Holding Grip To Holding Endotracheal Tube For orotracheal Intubation Using C Mac Videolaryngoscope

A Prospective Comparative Study To Asses The Efficacy Of between The Fingers Grip With The Conventional Pen Holding Grip To Hold An endotracheal Tube For orotracheal Intubation Using C Mac Videolaryngoscope - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089052
Enrollment
64
Registered
2025-06-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis

Interventions

Intervention1: patients undergoing orotracheal intubation using c macvideolaryngoscope by modified finger holding technique for holding enndotracheal tube: Total duration 6 months.Patients undergoing

Sponsors

Dr B R Ambedkar Medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age - 18 to 60 years and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status(ASA- PS) I and II patients. 2.Patients with Mallampati grades (MP) 1,2, 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Refusal to participate in the study, Patients with cormack Lehane (CL) grades 3b ,4 2.patients with an anticipated difficult airway, history of difficult airway in previousdocuments, head and neck pathology, and haemodynamic instability. 3. patients with cervical spine instability , reactive airway , gastric reflux , cerebralhemorrhage will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To measure time required for endotracheal intubation for each grip using CMAC videolaryngoscopy 2.To compare the requirement of external assistance in the form of thebackward upward rightward pressure manoeuvre (BURP) to performendotracheal intubationTimepoint: from base line to30 min

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Comparing the number of attempts for endotrachealintubation for each grip and use of external aids such asbougie and stylet 2.The variations in the haemodynamic parameters heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP)) in the two groups.Timepoint: Time from enotracheal intubation to30 min of intraoperative period

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr SUVINA

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College

nandinivraj@yahoo.co.in9535024072

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026