Improving Gum Health: Comparing Two Grafting Methods in Recession Treatment

De-epithelialized gingival graft versus sub epithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using the tunnel technique: A randomized clinical trial. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/06/089038

Enrollment

Registered

2025-06-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: -

Interventions

Intervention1: De-epithelialized gingival graft: After phase I the patient will be recalled. Clinical parameters will be recorded. Patient consent for surgery and LA will be taken. Local anesthesia

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Miller s class I and class II recession, more than 1mm width of attached gingiva and Minimum 2 and maximum 6 sites

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Intake of medications which impede periodontal tissue health and healing, Medical contraindications for periodontal surgical procedures, Pregnancy and lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Mean root coverage (MRC), Complete root coverage (CRC)Timepoint: Mean root coverage (MRC), Complete root coverage (CRC)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Bleeding on probing (BOP), Probing depth (PD), Clinical attachment level (CAL), Recession depth(RD), Recession width (RW), Keratinized tissue height (KTH), Gingival thickness (GT),Timepoint: 1,3,7,28 days and 3rd month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nayana Patel

GOVT. DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL JAMNAGAR

drnayanagpatel@gmail.com9825191911

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026