FindTrial
Sign In

Action Observation vs Standard Therapy for Bed Mobility and Trunk Control After Stroke

Effect of Action Observation Training (AOT) Versus Conventional Therapy on Bed Mobility and Trunk Control in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088783
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-06-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G938- Other specified disorders of brain

Interventions

Intervention1: Action Observation Therapy: To improve Bed Mobility and Trunk Control. For 30 min and 7 consecutive days Control Intervention1: Conventional Therapy: To improve Bed Mobility and Trunk c

Sponsors

DVVPFs College of Physiotherapy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Acute Stroke. Glasgow Coma Scale GCS Score 13 to 15. Patients willing to participate. Patients with first onset Stroke.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with impaired vision and hearing problem. Patients with any kind of fracture. Patients with Musculoskeletal and cardiovascular conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)Timepoint: Baseline, 1 week—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS):-Timepoint: Baseline, 1 week;Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of movement (STREAM)Timepoint: Baseline, 1 week;ICF CodesTimepoint: Baseline, 1 week—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suvarna Ganvir

DVVPFs College of Physiotherapy

suvarna.ganvir@gmail.com9372910683

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026