Skip to content

Comparison of Two 3D Face Scan Methods for Accuracy in Teens seeking Orthodontic treatment.

Comparative evaluation of 3D facial scan obtained using two different image acquisition technology (LiDAR and TrueDepth) with true anthropometric measurement for adolescent patients seeking orthodontic treatment : a cross sectional study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088749
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-06-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Dr Aditya Talwar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a. Adolescents aged between 16 to 28 years. b. Patients seeking orthodontic treatment for malocclusion or dentofacial discrepancies. c. Individuals with no previous history of orthodontic treatment. d. Ability to cooperate during scanning procedures and maintain a neutral facial expression. e. Informed consent obtained from both the patient and their legal guardian.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a. Presence of craniofacial anomalies, syndromes, or history of facial trauma/surgery. b. Previous orthodontic or orthognathic treatment that may alter natural facial structure. c. Patients with active skin conditions/ facial piercings that could interfere with scan quality. d. Uncooperative behavior or inability to remain still during the scanning process. e. Individuals with medical conditions affecting posture or facial musculature. f. Patients with any facial prosthetic devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the accuracy , reliability, and clinical applicability of 3D facial scans obtained using two different image acquisition technologies - LiDAR and TrueDepth in adolescent patients seeking orthodontic treatment with their arthropometric measurementsTimepoint: T0- Baseline T1- After 2 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the suitability of each technology for capturing facial morphology with precision necessary for orthodontic diagnosis & treatment planning.Timepoint: T0- Baseline T1- After 2 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aditya Talwar

Manav rachna dental college

dradityatalwar@gmail.com8108225424

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026