None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: REGULAR TOOTHBRUSH: CHILD ASKED TO CONTINUE THE REGULAR ORAL HYGIENE PRACTICE
Control Intervention1: U TOOTHBRUSH: U SHAPED TOOTHBRUSH DESIGNED FOR CHILDREN
Control Intervention2: PEDO
Sponsors
ANKITA CHANDAK
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: This randomized controlled trial is being conducted in a preschool setting with 165 children aged 3 6 years.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: STUDENT ABOVE THE AGE GROUP OF 6 YEARS NOT WILLING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| EFFICACY OF U SHAPED TOOTHBRUSH IS BETTER THAN PEDO HEAD TOOTHBRUSHTimepoint: AT BASELINE AND 2 WEEKS | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| NILTimepoint: NIL | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactANKITA CHANDAK
DR HSRSM DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
Outcome results
None listed