FindTrial
Sign In

A study comparing two oxygen delivery devices to improve the patient safety and improve performance of EBUS procedures

Comparison of oxygenation through nasal airway to that through nasal prongs in patients undergoing intravenous anaesthesia for EBUS procedures. - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088648
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J958- Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of respiratory system, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasal airway: Oxygen will be provided through nasal airway in patients undergoing intravenous anesthesia for EBUS procedures for around 40 minutes Control Intervention1: Nasal prongs: O

Sponsors

Dr Ankita
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Able to give informed consent, spontaneously breathe throughout procedure, no history of cardiorespiratory or hepatic failure, baseline saturation more than 90%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age more than 80years, chronic hypoxemic, nasal bone fracture, uncorrectable coagulopathy, pregnant, arrythmias history, bmi more than 30, previous nasal surgery, cardiorespiratory or hepatic failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Desaturation eventsTimepoint: 10 minutes in recovery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Procedural desaturation, interruptions and duration, coughing, nasal bleed and patients comfortTimepoint: 10 mins in recovery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnkita

Indraprastha apollo hospital, New Delhi

vijaysnair95@gmail.com8130556353

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026