Skip to content

Comparing Two Dental Materials in Saving Healthy Tooth Pulp: A Study Using Both Sides of the Mouth

Comparative Evaluation Of Nano-Tricalcium Silicate Cement And Mineral Trioxide Aggregate In Vital Pulp Therapy Using Split-Mouth Design: Clinical, Radiographic, And Biomarker Analysis - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088598
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-06-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Nano-Tricalcium Silicate Cement group: After achieving hemostasis, Nano-Tricalcium Silicate Cement will be carefully placed as a 1 2 mm layer directly over the exposed and vital pulp t

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients must have at least two teeth, indicated for vital pulp therapy VPT due to caries or trauma, to facilitate the split-mouth design. The selected teeth must be suitable for VPT as per the American Association of Endodontists AAE guidelines. Patients must be between eighteen to forty five years of age, ensuring cooperation with the study protocol. Patients must provide informed consent and agree to attend all follow-up appointments as per the study timeline.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient who do not give written informed consent Teeth not indicated for VPT as per the guidelines of AAE. Patients with any systemic conditions or on any drugs e.g., diabetes that could affect healing or interfere with outcomes. Individuals with known allergies to medications used in the procedure. Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Focusing on parameters such as postoperative pain, sensitivity, and pulp vitality and particularly dentin bridge formation and evidence of successful pulp healing. Timepoint: Focusing on parameters such as postoperative pain, sensitivity, and pulp vitality and particularly dentin bridge formation and evidence of successful pulp healing. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at multiple intervals: 24 hours after the procedure to assess the immediate post-treatment response, 1, 3 and 6 months for further assessment of healing, and at 12, 24 and 36 months to evaluate the sustained clinical outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Molecular biomarkers in pulpal and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), including inflammatory and regenerative markers.Timepoint: 24 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pragya Pandey

King George s Medical University, UP, Lucknow 226003

w.pragya78@gmail.com8415942428

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026