Skip to content

Comparison of two different protocols on upper limb function in patient with stroke

Comparison of Intermittent Long-Term Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Protocol Versus Standard Motor Relearning Program for Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Stroke - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088472
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G939- Disorder of brain, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: INTERMITTENT LONG TERM CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY PROTOCOL: one hour per day for 5 days per 6 weeks Control Intervention1: STANDARD MOTOR RELEARNING PROGRAM: one hour per day f

Sponsors

DYPatil college of physiotherapy
Lead Sponsor
DYPatil college of physiotherapy
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All Genders 2. Age group 40 to 70 years 3. First incidence of stroke 4. 6th day post Stroke 5. Hemiplegia due to thromboembolus of Middle cerebral artery involvement confirmed on CT or MRI 6. Brunnstroms voluntary control of affected extremity Grade 2 7. Mini Mental Status Examination (MMES) score more than 24 8. Motor Activity Log scores more than 2 9. Patient having at least one care giver at home

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Hemodynamically unstable patient 2. Patient who developed recurrent stroke during rehabilitation 3. History of traumatic and arthritic conditions interfering with upper extremity function 4. Patients with sensory Stroke 5. Patients who are unable to understand instructions and follow commands

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Motor activity Log-28 2.Nine Hole Peg Test 3.Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity 4. Hand Dynamometer Timepoint: Subjects will be evaluated 2 times-pretraining 1st week and post-training after 6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Serum lactate level Timepoint: Subjects will be evaluated 2 times pre-training 1st week & post-training after 6 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmruta Dhondiram Doijad

D.Y.Patil Educational Society (Deemed to be University),Kolhapur

shimpasharma@gmail.com9820017268

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026