FindTrial
Sign In

A study on how different methods to move the gums affect the fit of dental crowns in patients needing tooth caps.

Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of crown on molar by cord and cordless gingival retraction methods. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088455
Enrollment
25
Registered
2025-06-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Cordless gingival retraction technique using 3M ESPE Astringent retraction paste: 3M ESPE Astringent retraction paste Duration Of Intervention - 2 Minutes Frequency - Once per patient C

Sponsors

Dr Saumya A Patel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The age range of 18-70 years with natural permanent teeth. Healthy periodontium Molars of maxillary and mandibular arch Periodontal Disease Index Score should be 0(zero)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with history of systemic disease Subjects with history of neuromuscular disease Subjects with deleterious habits Pregnant/lactating women Tipped, tilted, or rotated teeth Subjects with any kind of periodontal pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of efficacy of corded versus cordless gingival retraction technique.Timepoint: 1 week—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Saumya A Patel

Faculty Of Dental Science Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat

drsomilmathur@gmail.com9825060060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026