Safety and efficacy of video laryngoscpy versus conventional laryngoscopy for successful endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients between 0 to 7 years

Safety and efficacy of video laryngoscpy versus conventional laryngoscopy for successful endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients between 0 to 7 years : Prospective randomized study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/06/088423

Enrollment

Registered

2025-06-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Safety and efficacy of video laryngoscpy: Safety and efficacy of video laryngoscpy for successful endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients between 0 to 7 years Intervention2: Nil:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient belonging to age group 0 to 7 years Patient posted for surgery under general anaesthesia Children belonging to ASA l and ll

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Congenital facial deformity Difficult Airway Cases taken up as emergency

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken to intubate with video laryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopeTimepoint: Baseline 1 minutes 3 minutes 5 minutes	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Number of attempts Hemodynamic response ComplicationsTimepoint: Baseline 1 minutes 3 minutes 5 minutes	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rochana Bakshi

D Y Patil School Of Medicine

drrochana@yahoo.com9323272151

Outcome results