Skip to content

Analysis on Stability of Ultraviolet Activated Implants vs Conventional Implants

Analysis on Stability of UV Activated Implants vs Conventional Implants using Resonance Frequency Analysis and CBCT : a clinical trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088393
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-06-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: UV activated implant: surface modified implants treated with ultravoilet radiation for 24 hours Control Intervention1: Machined implants: Regular titanium implants

Sponsors

Rungta college of dental science and research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient with edentulous spaces suitable for implant as well as prosthetic rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient with uncontrolled diabetes or any other systemic coronary diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CALCULATION OF INSERTIONAL TORQUE DIFFERENCE OF RFA VALUES CALUTION OF HU UNIT IN CBCTTimepoint: BASE LINE (TO) 1 MONTH (T1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint:

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Karthik Krishna M

Rungta college of dental sciences and research

karthikmunagala@gmail.com7830104004

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026