Skip to content

CUTTING ORAL TISSUE WITH ELECTRIC CUTTER AND LASER CUTTER IN MANDIBULAR FRACTURES AND MEASURING OUTCOMES.

A Comparative Study of Intra-Oral Incision with Diode Laser vs Electrocautery for Anterior mandibular fractures. An Observational Study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088390
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-06-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients aged 18 60 years with a diagnosis of anterior mandibular fracture. Patients requiring surgical intervention for their fractures under general anaesthesia. Patients who have given informed consent to participate in the study. Patients who do not have any known contraindications to laser or electrocautery use.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of significant systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppressive therapy, blood clotting disorders) that may affect wound healing. Patients with active infections in the region of the fracture or the surgical site. Patients who have had prior facial surgeries or previous radiation therapy in the maxillofacial region. Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Those with mental disabilities or conditions that impair their ability to understand the study or provide informed consent. Patients who decline participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the healing time of incisions made with diode laser and electrocautery To compare the postoperative pain levels between the two techniquesTo assess the incidence of complications infection dehiscence following the two incision techniques.To analyse the precision and control of the surgical site in both methods.To assess time of incisions with electrocautery and diode laser.To assess the impact of both methods on soft tissue damage and fibrosis. Timepoint: Intraoperative Day 1postoperative 1 week 4 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complications: Frequency of postoperative complications such as infection, wound dehiscence, fibrosis. Incision Precision & Control: Assessment of the surgical precision based on the ability to make clean incisions with minimal collateral tissue damage. This will be evaluated by the surgeon & documented. Patient Satisfaction: Measured using For patient satisfaction, the participants will be asked to indicate the degree of satisfaction on a VAS. The end-points of the scale displayed completely dissatisfied on the left side (0) & fully satisfied on the right side (10) Surgical procedure, & functional outcomes like chewing & speaking.Timepoint: Post operative,1 week,4 week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR CHILAKALA AKHIL YADAV

MANIPAL COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES,MANIPAL

chilakala.mcodsmpl2024@learner.manipal.edu7097277136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026