Skip to content

To compare HIFU and MNRF procedure for facial ageing

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU) VERSUS MICRONEEDLING RADIOFREQUENCY (MNRF) FOR SKIN REJUVENATION. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088333
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L989- Disorder of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: microneedling radiofrequency (MNRF): Three sessions of MNRF over the face, one session done every month and the result is assessed 1 month after the last session. Control Intervention1:

Sponsors

Pacific Medical college and hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients willing to undergo HIFU for facial rejuvenation. Patients willing to undergo MNRF for facial rejuvenation. Patients willing to give informed consents. Patients willing for follow-up and post-treatment care as advised.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have underwent other cosmetic procedures like chemical peels, microdermabrasions, microneedling or laser skin resurfacing within the preceding 3 months. Patients with poor compliance. Patients with unrealistic expectations. Patients with the following conditions: Pregnancy and breastfeeding Any active systemic illness Any inflammatory skin diseases Anticoagulant medications Use of photosensitizing medications within the past 1 year Active or history of cancer in the past 5 years History of keloidal tendency or hypertrophic scarring Patients with electrical implant devices

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Aesthetic Improvement in pre and post procedure using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale.(GAIS) GAIS ranges from 1-5 where 1 being very much improved and 5 being worseTimepoint: baseline and 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sanjeev Vaishampayan

Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur

sanjeevssv1@gmail.com7024353240

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026