FindTrial
Sign In

An open label single arm study to evaluate great saphenous vein harvested with assistance of LARYNGOSCOPE for patients undergoing cardiac surgery could deliver equivalent or superior outcomes compared to conventional methods like Endoscope assisted Vein harvesting and Open vein harvesting technique.

A prospective longitudinal single arm study to establish the safety and efficacy of laryngoscope assisted vein harvesting technique over minimal invasive vein harvesting and open vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. - NA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088136
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-06-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I257- Atherosclerosis of coronary arterybypass graft(s) and coronary artery of transplanted heart with angina pectoris Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Laryngoscope assisted vein harvesting technique: Minimally invasive vein harvesting using a laryngoscope involves making small incisions along the veins path, using the laryngoscope for

Sponsors

Indus International Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient admitted under CABG OPD and IPD or OPD/IPD 18 Years and above Patient/LAR/Impartial witness voluntarily providing Informed Consent Form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with total arterial bypass patients Patient with varicose veins Patient with history of leg surgery. Patient with far away location.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of (LARYNGOSCOPE ASSISTED VEIN HARVESITNG TECHNIQUE (LAVH)) compared to Minimal Incision Vein Harvesting (MVH) and Open Vein Harvesting (OVH) in CABG patients by assessing wound healing complications, post-operative infection rates, sensory skin abnormalities, graft vessel patency, obstruction rates, recovery time, procedure duration, and surgical success rates.Timepoint: During Surgery Post surgery at day 1 At discharge Day 14 Day 30 Day 60 Day 90—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the cost-effectiveness between LARYNGOSCOPE ASSISTED VEIN HARVESITNG TECHNIQUE (LAVH) vs MVH and OVH by analyzing direct operative costs and length of hospital stay; to evaluate patient-centered outcomes including post-operative pain levels, cosmetic satisfaction, and quality of life measures; to assess technical aspects such as length and quality of harvested vein, harvesting time, and need for procedure conversion; and to determine long-term outcomes including graft patency at 6 and 12 months, incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), need for repeat revascularization, and long-term wound complications.Timepoint: During Surgery Post surgery at day 1 At discharge Day 14 Day 30 Day 60 Day 90 6 Months 1 year 3 Year 5 Year—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDharmender Singh Lather

Indus International Hospital

drbansalsurg10@gmail.com9013355907

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026