Skip to content

To compare Ksharsutra treatment and surgical procedures for peri anal fistula

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on The Effect Of “Ksharsutra treatment ? (Ayurvedic Medical Seton) Vs Conventional Surgical Treatment in Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Fistula-In-Ano - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088135
Enrollment
384
Registered
2025-06-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K603- Anal fistula Health Condition 3: K605- Anorectal fistula Health Condition 4: K604- Rectal fistula

Interventions

Intervention1: Ksharsutra insertion for fistula-in-ano: After piercing the internal opening, the tip of the probe comes out through the anal canal. Ksharsutra is fixed through the ends of the metal pr

Sponsors

Professor. Virinder Kumar Bansal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants having low anal fistula (subcutaneous, submucosal, inter sphincteric fistula & trans sphincteric with less than 30% involvement of external sphincter) with single tract or multiple small tracts within 2-3 cm of each other and within 5 cm of anal verge diagnosed during clinical examination.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Age 70 years 2.Severely immunocompromised or compromised cardio pulmonary status 3.Participants with uncontrolled comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension 4.HIV/hepatitis B/VDRL positive 5.Colorectal carcinoma 6.Ulcerative colitis & Crohn’s patients 7.On anti-tubercular therapy 8.Fistulas other than ano-rectal like recto vaginal fistula etc. 9.Anterior fistula-in-ano in women & pregnant women 10.Osteomyelitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the efficacy of Guggulu-based Ksharsutra treatment vs. conventional surgical treatment in primary healing of fistula-in-anoTimepoint: 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the recurrence rates of anal fistula between the Guggulu-based Ksharsutra treatment & conventional surgical treatment during follow-upTimepoint: 3 months;To evaluate the impact of both interventions on perianal symptoms including itching, discharge, burning sensation, pain, & anal incontinence at follow upTimepoint: 3 months;To assess the unit cutting time & healing time associated with the Ksharsutra interventionTimepoint: 3 months;To compare the duration of hospital stay & number of hospital visits required in both treatment groups.Timepoint: 3 months;To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Guggulu-based Ksharsutra treatment compared to surgical management.Timepoint: 3 months;To assess the number of workdays lost due to the disease & its treatment in both groupsTimepoint: 3 months;To evaluate & compare the quality of life post-treatment using standardized tools such as the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) & Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQOL)Timepoint: 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ansin Sreeraj S

AIIMS, New Delhi

drvkbansal@gmail.com9810348479

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026