Skip to content

Comparison of Nerve Mobilization with Neck Movements Versus Neck Movements Alone in People with Cervical Pain (Cervical Radiculopathy)-A Randomised controlled Trial

Effect of Neurodynamic With Cervical Lateral Glide Versus Cervical Lateral Glide Alone In Cervical Radiculopathy-A Randomised controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088071
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-06-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M953- Acquired deformity of neck Health Condition 2: M00-M99- Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: Neurodynamic with cervical lateral glide: Patient will undergo a series of Neurodynamic mobilization technique , including upper limb tension test position with slider and tensioner to

Sponsors

Uttar Pradesh University Of Medical Sciences Saifai Etawah
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient should diagnose with confirmed diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy by physician. 2. Patient should experience radiating pain on upper extremity with and without sensory deficit. 3. Patient with reduced cervical range of motion, increased radiating pain decreased functional capacity or quality of life. 4. Patients condition should be more than 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient with cervical instability, cord compression, spinal tumour, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis and prolong use of steroid. 2.Patient with cervical and thoracic spine surgery. 3.Patients with vertigo, cervical spine stenosis and vertebrobasilar disease. 4.Trauma under 14 days. 5.Cervical spine and upper limb Traumatic injury.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain , Range of Motion and Quality of Life.Timepoint: baseline, at the end of 2nd weeks follow up 2 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactArchana verma

Uttar Pradesh University Of Medical Sciences ,Saifai Etawah

anjaliupums@gmail.com8604612404

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026