FindTrial
Sign In

Safety and efficacy of video laryngoscpy versus conventional laryngoscopy for successful endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients between 0 to 7 years

Safety and efficacy of video laryngoscpy versus conventional laryngoscopy for successful endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients between 0 to 7 years : Prospective randomized study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/088030
Enrollment
18
Registered
2025-06-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: safety and efficacy of video laryngoscopy: safety and efficacy of video laryngoscopy for successful endotracheal intubation in pediatric

Sponsors

D Y Patil University School of Medicine and Hospital Nerul Navi Mumbai
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients belonging to age group 0 to 7 years Patients posted for surgery under general anaesthesia Children belonging to ASA| and || Category

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Congenital facial deformity Difficult Airway Cases taken up as emergency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken to intubate with video laryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopeTimepoint: Baseline 1 minutes 3 minutes 5 minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of attempts Hemodynamic response Complications Timepoint: Baseline 1 minutes 3 minutes 5 minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrRochana Bakhshi

D Y Patil School Of Medicine

drrochana@yahoo.com9323272151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026