Comparison of treatment outcomes with Rhinoplastic Appliance System with and without the use of intraoral plate in patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Comparative Assessment of Rhinoplastic Appliance System with and without the Integration of Intraoral Appliance in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/05/087973

Enrollment

Registered

2025-05-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Q385- Congenital malformations of palate, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasoalveolar moulding in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Nasoalveolar Moulding with Rhinoplastic Appliance System with intraoral plate Control Intervention1: Nasoalveolar moulding with

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip And Palate Born at full term 0 days 3 months infants for PSIO 3-6 months infants for post surgery follow up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Syndromic cleft lip and palate Infant with systemic diseases Infants with Simonart s Band Parents/ guardians not providing assent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of intra group arch dimension and facial esthetics comparison of inter group evaluation of arch dimension and facial esthetics Timepoint: T0 before Nasoalveolar moulding at baseline T1 after Nasoalveolar moulding at 4 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of arch dimension and facial esthetics after primary lip surgeryTimepoint: T2 6 months after primary lip surgery	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Dhruv Ahuja

Manav Rachna Dental College

drpuneetbatra@gmail.com9810335961

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026