Comparing the Effects of a Robotic Hand Exercise and Electrical Muscle Stimulation on Hand Movement and Skill in People with Weakness on One Side of the Body Hemiparesis

Comparing the Effects of Robotic Hand-Mirror Mode Versus Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Motor Functions and Gross Manual Dexterity in Hemiparesis - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/05/087965

Enrollment

Registered

2025-05-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G811- Spastic hemiplegia

Interventions

Intervention1: Robotic Hand-Mirror Mode with Task Oriented Training: 30 minutes of Robotic hand training along with Task oriented training Control Intervention1: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation w

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Hemiparesis Stroke incident more than 1 month prior to the study Age 45 to 70 years Modified Ashworth Scale 1 to 3 for upper limb Brunnstorm Stages 3 to 5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: More than one Cerebrovascular accident Impaired Visual or Auditory Bilateral Impairment Behavioural Dysfunction Language Barrier Unable to understand Hindi or English

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Fugl Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (Wrist and Hand) for Motor Functions Box and Block Test for Unilateral Gross Manual Dexterity Mechanical Pinch Gauge for Pinch Strength Timepoint: At Baseline and After 4 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sunita Kuamri

Manav Rachna Institute of Research and Studies

deepansha001@gmail.com9810022509

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026