Skip to content

Comparison of two different methods to increase crown height for crown prosthesis.

Comparative Evaluation of Apically positioned papilla Preservation flap and Conventional crown lengthening procedure for keratinised tissue augmentation: a randomised clinical trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087764
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-05-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K085- Unsatisfactory restoration of tooth

Interventions

Intervention1: An apically Positioned papilla preservation flap.: 1)FIRST VISIT- After obtaining informed consent form, a detailed case history will be recorded. Photographs will be taken and all the

Sponsors

Dr Samiksha Ghagre
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Individuals more than 18 years of age. 2. Patients with insufficient abutment height, needing a prosthetic restoration. 3. Full mouth bleeding score less than 20 percent. 4. Full mouth Plaque score less than 20 percent. 5. Presence of less than or equal to 2 mm of keratinised tissue on either (Buccal/Palatal) aspect. 6. Presence of more than or equal to 2 mm of keratinised tissue on either (Buccal/Palatal) aspect. 7. Interdental distance of more than or equal to 2 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Systemic condition contraindicating surgical interventions. 2. Pregnancy or lactation. 3. Smoking more than or equal to 10 cigarettes per day. 4. Clinical or radiographic signs of periapical pathology. 5. The patient not willing to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare and evaluate the keratinized tissue augmentation after apically positioned papilla preservation flap and conventional crown lengthening procedure.Timepoint: Keratinized tissue augmentation - time point baseline, 1 month and 3 month.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain severity is the secondary outcome.Timepoint: Pain severity time point at- baseline, 1 month, 3 month.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Lalitha Shiggaon

Jawahar Medical Foundations Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Dental college, Dhule

drlalithavk@gmail.com8408876666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026