FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative Analysis Of Two Minimally Invasive Approach Osseodensification vs Piezoelectric Internal Sinus Lift In Terms Of Patient Related Outcome Measures Using OHIP-14: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Analysis of Two Minimally Invasive Approaches for Maxillary Sinus Lift Procedures - Osseodensification vs. Piezoelectric Internal Sinus Lift for Dental Implant Placement In Terms Of Patient Related Outcome Measures Using OHIP - 14: A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087745
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-05-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Dental Implant placement: sinus lift procedure following osseodensification protocol Control Intervention1: dental Implant placement: sinus lift procedure following Piezoelectic protoco

Sponsors

Rummilla Anand V A
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient partially edentulous with maxillary posterior edentulous ridge after extraction of more than 4 months. 2.Both genders will be selected males and females. 3.Adult patients aged above 18yrs. 4.Initial residual alveolar ridge height ranging between 4 to 5 mm and bone densities of D2 and D3 according to preoperative CBCT. 5.No previous surgery or radiation treatment on the maxillary sinus.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Smokers. 2.Pregnant or lactating females. 3.Psychiatric disorders. 4.Uncontrolled systemic disease. 5.Hematologic diseases and coagulation disorders. 6.Chemotherapy or radiotherapy of the head and neck area, and immune-compromised status. 7.Medical conditions affecting bone metabolism and ongoing treatment with bisphosphonates drugs or systemic steroids. 8.Presence of acute or chronic sinus pathology or sinus membrane perforation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess patient related outcomes as per OHIP-14Timepoint: To assess patient related outcomes as per OHIP-14 at Baseline assessment, 1, 3, 6 months & 1year for implant stability & CBCT for bone density & vertical bone gain—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
primary and secondary implant stability bone density Vertical bone gain and loading time post implant placement Timepoint: immediate post op, 4 weeks and 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rummilla Anand V A

Sri Ramachandra Institute Of Higher Education And Research

muthukumars@sriramachandra.edu.in9884118681

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026