This is a one year study which will check the performance of three different tooth colored restoration in the upper surface of the tooth which have decay

One-year comparative evaluation of the clinical performance of three different nanohybrid composites; Low shrinkage, Pre-heated and Conventional, in simple Class I carious lesions-a randomized clinical study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/05/087723

Enrollment

Registered

2025-05-27

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K025- Dental caries on pit and fissure surface

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional Nanohybrid composites: One-year comparative evaluation of the clinical performance of three different nanohybrid composites

Low shrinkage, Pre-heated and Conventional, in simple Class I carious lesions-a randomized clinical study Control Intervention1: Pre heated nanohybrid composites: One-year comparative evaluation of t

Low shrinkage, Pre-heated and Conventional, in simple Class I carious lesions-a randomized clinical study Control Intervention2: Low shrinkage nanohybrid composites: One-year comparative evaluation of

Low shrinkage, Pre-heated and Conventional, in simple Class I carious lesions-a randomized clinical study

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients over the age of 18, classified according to the ASA as ASA I or II, with good oral hygiene, and free of periodontal disease Patients with Primary carious lesions: Simple Class I carious lesions and the caries that are detectable on radiograph. Teeth subjected to Electrical pulp testing and cold test giving signs of reversible pulpitis. A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with poor oral hygiene, severe periodontal disease, mal-aligned and heavy bruxism resulting in lost physiologic contour developmental anomaly or pathology or congenital defects will be excluded. Teeth having compound and complex cavities and without opposing natural dentition will be excluded. Pregnant and lactating mothers will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Results of the study will help us to know that which material clinically performs better between Low shrinkage, Pre-heated composite and Conventional Nanohybrid composite resin as restorative materialTimepoint: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vishnu Rathore

K M Shah Dental College Vadodara Gujarat

dr.vishnurathore84@gmail.com7575071175

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026