Skip to content

A randomized controlled trial to compare the blood pressure in response to placement of a tube in the trachea using a video laryngoscope or a video stylet in adults receiving general anesthesia

A randomized controlled trial to compare the hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation with c-mac video laryngoscope versus c-mac video stylet in adults receiving general anesthesia for elective surgery - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087672
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-05-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: C-mac video laryngoscope vs C-mac video stylet used for orotracheal intubation in adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery: To compare the hemodynamic response

Sponsors

Lady Hardinge Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA physical status 1 2. Elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Anticipated difficult airway 2. Upper respiratory tract infection 3. Patients with high risk for aspiration such as hiatal hernia, gut surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the hemodynamic response (Systolic blood pressure ) orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope and C-MAC video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgeryTimepoint: At preinduction and 1 minute after tracheal intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to the changes in SBP, HR, DBP, MAPTimepoint: At following time intervals 1. Preinduction 2. Preintubation 3. Immediately after tracheal intubation 4. At 1 minute after tracheal intubation 5. At 3 minutes after tracheal intubation 6. At 5 minutes after tracheal intubation;To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to time taken for tracheal intubation defined as the time from introduction of laryngoscope to the time of first capnography trace. Timepoint: time taken for tracheal intubation defined as the time from introduction of laryngoscope to the time of first capnography trace. ;To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to number of failed intubationTimepoint: Failure of intubation shall be defined if more than two attempts are taken to secure the airway. In such a situation, the airway will be secured as per the anesthesiologist discretion and the patient will be excluded from the study.;To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to number of patients requiring Optimal External Laryngeal Manipulation for achieving successful intubation in each groupTimepoint: OELM shall be allowed for achieving successful intubation & number of patients requiring application of this maneuver will be recorded.;To compare orotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope or video stylet in ASA grade I adult patients receiving general anaesthesia for elective surgery with regards to number of patients with

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGarima Agrawal

Lady Hardinge Medical College

garima2396@gmail.com8826640501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026