FindTrial
Sign In

How well different gum displacing agents work for making better impressions.

Efficacy of mechanical and chemico-mechanical gingival retraction systems: An in-vivo experimental study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087659
Enrollment
108
Registered
2025-05-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: mechanical gingival retraction system: Cords are used to displace gingiva away from tooth . Placed in the sulcus for 2-5 minutes. Control Intervention1: chemico-mechanical: Retraction p

Sponsors

Institute of dental sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with more than 18 years of age. Patients requiring preparation for full coverage restorations. Sound gingival health of abutment teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Rotated, tipped or tilted abutment teeth. Patient with medical condition which could be affecting their periodontal status. Developmental abnormality or retrogressive age changes in the teeth. Teeth with gingival pathology.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Gingival retraction using which material is better.Timepoint: March 2025 February 2026—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chandana Nair

Institute of Dental Sciences, Pilibhit by-pass road, Bareilly (U.P.), INDIA

chandana.nathan@gmail.com9177013000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026