Skip to content

A study comparing two different filling materials used in baby teeth after root canal treatment over a period of 12 months

Clinical And Radiographical Assessment Of Endoflas+ Eugenol And Endoflas+Propolis As Obturating Material In Primary Molars A 12 Months Follow Up Study - nill

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087638
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-05-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K044- Acute apical periodontitis of pulpal origin

Interventions

Intervention1: To evaluate clinically and radiographically the effectiveness of Endoflas with Propolis and Endoflas with Eugenol as an obturating material in Primary Molars.: children aged 4-9 years r

Sponsors

Ahmedabad Dental Corporation
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Frankl behavior scores of 3 (positive) and 4 (definitely positive) are cooperative and suitable for dental procedures like pulpectomy. Treatment is considered when at least two-thirds of the root length remains and there is enough tooth structure to place a rubber dam clamp. Primary molars diagnosed with chronic irreversible pulpitis meet the clinical criteria for pulpectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a diagnosed systemic disease. 2. Patients showing disruptive behavior during the procedure. 3.Patients with non-restorable teeth clinically, pulpal floor perforation, excessive mobility. 4. Presence of frank dentoalveolar abscess or extra-oral swelling (presence of purulence in the canals). 5. Patients with more than one-third of pathologic root resorption.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This study is aimed to access the compatibility of propolis with Endoflas and clinical parameters of this combination may prove better than conventional method, after 12 months follow up periodTimepoint: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Poorav Pankaj Kumar Patel

Government Dental College and Hospital Ahmedabad

shandent1@gmail.com9825666575

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026