Skip to content

Comparing the functional outcome of peroneus longus tendon graft versus hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery in a tertiary care center in chengalpattu district

Assessment Of functional outcome OF Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A comparative randomized control trail study in a tertiary care center in chengalpettu district. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087370
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-05-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S835- Sprain of cruciate ligament of knee

Interventions

Intervention1: Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction using Peroneus Longus tendon autograft: Patients who are clinically diagnosed with Anterior Cruciate Ligament and fulfilling the i

Sponsors

Athene Olivia Rosette Morely
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Radiologically and clinically proven Anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with concomitant chondral lesions greater than grade III. 2.Patients with previous injury of affected knee. 3.Revision cases or previous surgeries. 4.Joint hypermobility syndrome. 5.Patients with any osteoarthritic changes of the affected knee or ankle.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Knee Function: Assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form and Lysholm knee score. These are validated questionnaires that assess knee-related quality of life, functional stability, and symptoms such as pain and swelling. 2.Tegner Activity Scale: Measures the level of activity before and after surgery. 3 Range of Motion (ROM): The degree of knee flexion and extension will be recorded at each follow-up visit.Timepoint: 2 weeks post-surgery: Initial check-up for wound healing, pain management, and early functional progress. o 6 weeks: Progress check for ROM, strength, and early rehabilitation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Anterior Lachman Test and Pivot Shift Test: To evaluate the stability of the knee joint and graft function. Strength Testing: Isokinetic testing to evaluate quadriceps and hamstring strength and compare it with the contralateral knee. Graft Integrity: MRI or ultrasound imaging at 6 months post surgery to assess the graft s incorporation and integrity. Patient Reported Outcomes: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain will be used to assess the patients overall quality of life and pain levels.Timepoint: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years: Comprehensive functional assessment, strength testing, and knee stability evaluation (Lachman test, pivot shift test).

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAthene Olivia Rosette Morely

Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute

drfabdulkhader@hotmail.com9080901230

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026