Skip to content

Assessing the Precision of Tooth Widths from Conventional and Digital Models.

Accuracy of mesiodistal tooth measurements obtained from traditional model, stone model scan and intraoral scan. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087358
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-05-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Dr K SRI KAVYA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals with no history of orthodontic treatment. Individuals with no missing central and lateral incisors, canines, premolars, first molar in lower arch. Fully erupted permanent teeth from right first molar to left first molar on mandibular arch.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Morphological variations of tooth that can compromise the measurements. Dentition with grossly decayed teeth, root canal treated teeth, tooth with bulky restorations, prosthesis, proximal wear, proximal caries and fractured teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy of measurementsTimepoint: 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
intra examiner reliability interchangeability & acceptanceTimepoint: 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ranganayakulu Inuganti

GSL DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

akarsh.ranga@gmail.com9959434440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026