FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the Video Laryngoscope and McCoy blade for intubation under anaesthesia

A comparative study between King vision video laryngoscope and Mccoy blade for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia in a tertiary care hospital - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087129
Enrollment
248
Registered
2025-05-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: PCS-

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Bankura Sammilani Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.American Society of Anaesthesiology physical status class I and II 2.Patient undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Predictors of difficult airway A.Modified Mallampati class 3 or more B.Thyromental distance less than 6cm C.Limited neck extension D.BMI -30kg/m2 or more 2.ASA physical status class III or more 3.Emergency surgery 4.Inter incisor distance less than 3 cm 5.Pregnancy 6.Risk of gastric regurgitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamic changes during intubation will be less with video laryngoscope.Timepoint: Baseline,after induction, after 1 minutes, after 5 minutes,after 10 minutes.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare the visualization of airway between the two groups using Modified Cormack lehane grading 2.To compare the intubation difficulty score in both the group 3.To compare the duration of the tracheal intubation between two groupsTimepoint:—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Soumen Saha

BANKURA SAMMILANI MEDICAL COLLEGE

drsdatta66@gmail.com9800240055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026