Skip to content

Comparison of Physics forceps and Traditional forceps for tooth extraction

Efficacy of Physics Forceps Versus Conventional Forceps For Extraction Of Mandibular Premolar In Orthodontic Patients: A Split Mouth Comparative Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/087080
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-05-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M263- Anomalies of tooth position of fully erupted tooth or teeth Health Condition 2: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Physics Extraction Forceps: Physics Forceps Will Be Employed For Extraction As Follows. The Mucogingival Attachment Will Not Be Detached From The Tooth Unlike In Conventional Dental For

Sponsors

DR KARISHMA LENDE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age Range: 18 To 40 Years Old 2. Bilateral Mandibular Premolar Teeth Having Buccal/Lingual Plate Intact, Indicated For Orthodontic Extraction Purposes. 3. American Society Of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Type I Status Of Patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Abnormal Root Morphology (As Dilacerated, Severely Curved, Bulbous Roots, Etc.) As Depicted By Preoperative Periapical X-Ray Examination. 2. Failed Root Canal Treated Tooth, Periapical Infections, Tooth Indicated For Extraction For Prosthetic Reasons & Periodontally Compromised Tooth (Grade II & III Mobile Tooth) 3. Patients Taking Pain Altering Medication That May Interfere With Pain Response. 4. Medically Compromised Patients. 5. Tobacco Chewers & Smokers & Alcoholics. 6. Patient Who Has A Known Allergy To A Local Anaesthetic Or Requiring Repeated Injections Of Local Anaesthetics. 7. Patients Requiring Surgical Extraction. 8. Refused To Sign The Informed Consent. 9. Pregnancy And Lactating Females And Patients On Oral Contraceptives.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual Analog Pain Scale: 0-10 Extraction Socket Mucosal Wound Healing(Intraorally & Clinically) Bleeding From Extraction Socket Gingival Tissue Laceration: 0-5 mm - abrasion 5-10 mm - Partial above 10 mm - complete depth Torn Gingiva Time Taken For Tooth Extraction Fracture Of Buccal Cortical Plate & Fracture Of Tooth/Root.Timepoint: 1st day, 7th day 7th day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Age, Gender Post-operative pain on 7th dayTimepoint: Age, Gender Visual Analog Pain Scale:0-10

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anshul Sharma

Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute.

anshul.sharma63@gmail.com7587139040

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026