FindTrial
Sign In

To Compare Conventional and Digital Implant Impression Methods In Patients With Missing Teeth

A Comparitive Study To Assess The Accuracy Of Digital Implant Impression With Conventional Open Tray Implant Impression For Partially Edentulous Arch an in vivo study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/086896
Enrollment
35
Registered
2025-05-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Digital impression: impression will be made with intra oral digital scanner and scan body Control Intervention1: Conventional impression technique: Open Tray Implant Impression

Sponsors

KAVEESHA MISRA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 2 adjacent implants Age group : 19 to 74 years Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non parallel implants , angulation greater than 30 degree Porous cast

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
dimensional accuracy of digital implant impression with conventional impressionTimepoint: one time measurement following impression making with both techniques—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kaveesha Misra

Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences

harshithaalva@dscds.edu8408965163

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026