Skip to content

Comparative analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Topical Metformin and Topical Hydroquinone in Melasma

Safety and Efficacy of Topical Metformin and Topical Hydroquinone in patients with Melasma : A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/086473
Enrollment
62
Registered
2025-05-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L811- Chloasma

Interventions

Intervention1: Cream Metformin 4%: Cream Metformin 4% L/A OD HS for 3 months. Control Intervention1: Cream Hydroquinone 4%: Cream Hydroquinone 4% L/A OD HS for 3 months.

Sponsors

Priyal Suhalka
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients of Melasma aged 18 years to 50 years, who are not on medication of Melasma. Since atleast 2 weeks for topical therapy, 1month for systemic steroids, 3 months for cosmetic procedures such as laser ablation, dermabrasion, or peels.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Pregnant and lactating women. 2 Patients on oral contraceptives or photosensitivity drugs (tetracycline, spironolactone, phenytoin, and carbamazepine) 3 Renal or liver dysfunction patients. 4 Allergic to the medications being given. 5 Acne Vulgaris and Rosacea patients along with Melasma. 6 Patients with Post inflammatory hyperpigmentation, neurodermatitis, eczema, atrophy, telangiectasia along with Melasma. 7 Patients with history of neoplastic conditions. 8 Patients on Metformin therapy for any reason. 9 Patients with abnormal BMI. 10 Patients not willing to give consent to participate in study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Through the current study, we will be able to compare efficacy and safety of 4% Topical Metformin with 4% Topical Hydroquinone in patients with Melasma in terms of modified MASI ScoreTimepoint: 0, 4th week, 8th week, 12th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Comparasion of Dermoscopic patterns in both the drugs. 2. Comparison of patient satisfaction in treatment with both the drugs in terms of Patient self assessment score. 3. To evaluate relapse rate in both the groups.Timepoint: 0, 4th week, 8th week, 12th week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPriyal Suhalka

Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur

kapilvyas23@gmail.com7665056207

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026