A comparative study between two prevention modules to improve stroke awareness and promote primary prevention among the community by the healthcare workers.

Assessment of Comparative Efficacy of Adult Stroke Prevention Module versus Nigerian Educational Intervention Module for Primary Prevention of Stroke among Frontline Health Workers in terms of Skill Delegation Process- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/05/086446

Enrollment

300

Registered

2025-05-06

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Adult Stroke Prevention Module: Phase I- baseline assessment and randomization of frontline health workers, Phase II implementation of adult stroke prevention module among the frontli

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Phase I and PHASE II: i. The willing Frontline health workers from the selected blocks with permission from the community health officers. ii. Frontline health workers living within a 40 km radius from the identified health centres. Phase III: i Adults aged between 35 and 60 years. ii. Both male and female participants. iii. Individuals who can give informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Phase I and Phase II i Frontline health workers who are currently expecting a child ii. Those who decline participation or unable to give voluntary approval to take part in the study. iii. Participants diagnosed with advanced or life-limiting medical conditions that may hinder full engagement in the study process. PHASE III i. Adults with severe physical ailments ii. Bedridden individuals iii Mentally challenged individuals iv Adults with altered sensory perceptions.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
- Evaluate the efficacy of ASPM and NEIM among the Frontline Health workers in Group A and Group B - To compare the average score of risk factors of Stroke in Group A and Group B - Evaluate the efficacy of ASPM in comparison with NEIM in primary prevention of strokeTimepoint: 1 year and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Explore the lived experiences of the frontline health workers and the adults in Group A (ASPM) based on identification of predisposing elements and the primary prevention of StrokeTimepoint: 2 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ruchira Ankar

Datta Meghe Institute Education And Research

vinodhinibright24@gmail.com09600502336

Outcome results