FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluating image quality of IDose4 versus Precise Image for CECT abdomen and pelvis in high BMI individuals.

Comparision of image quality between IDose4 and Precise Image in high BMI individuals for CECT Abdomen and Pelvis - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/086387
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-05-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients more than 18 years referred for CECT abdomen CT High BMI, range from 25 to 29.9

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis; fatty liver are not taken Unstable or non-cooperative patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate image quality, the images reconstructed using IDoes4 and Precise Imaging which are compared based on CNR, SNR, and image noise values.Timepoint: April 2025 to March 2026—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nitika C Panakkal

Manipal College of Health Professions, MAHE, Manipal.

praveenasai.2001@gmail.com7416534245

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026