Skip to content

cranial vs cervical approach of ultrasound guided greater occipital nerve block in patients undergoing posterior fossa craniotomy

Comparison of efficacy of cranial vs cervical approach of ultrasound guided greater occipital nerve block in patients undergoing posterior fossa craniotomy: A randomized controlled study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/05/086358
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-05-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S048- Injury of other cranial nerves

Interventions

Intervention1: This study compares the efficacy of cranial and cervical ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block (GONB) techniques in patients undergoing posterior fossa craniotomy. Interventio

Sponsors

Operation Theater
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Study population parameters will be include all adult patients (age 18-65), undergoing elective posterior fossa craniotomy, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria should include patients with a history of chronic pain, prior nerve blocks, allergy to study medications, or contraindications to ultrasound-guided procedures. Randomization should be stratified by age and sex.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome was the OPS score at 12 hours postoperativelyTimepoint: The primary outcome was the OPS score at 12 hours postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes were: (1) OPS scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively; (2) duration of analgesia, defined as the time to the first postoperative analgesic request; (3) cumulative intraoperative fentanyl dose; (4) intraoperative heart rate and systolic blood pressure at baseline, skin incision, dural incision, 1-hour postintubation, 2-hour postintubation, 3-hour postintubation, dural closure, and skin closure; (5) postoperative heart rate and systolic blood pressure at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24-hour post procedure; (6) incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and; (7) incidence of nerve-block complications, namely scalp hematoma or inadvertent subarachnoid or intravascular injection of local anestheticTimepoint: Secondary outcomes were: (1) OPS scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 24 hours postoperatively; (2) duration of analgesia, defined as the time to the first postoperative analgesic request; (3) cumulative intraoperative fentanyl dose; (4) intraoperative heart rate and systolic blood pressure at baseline, skin incision, dural incision, 1-hour postintubation, 2-hour postintubation, 3-hour postintubation, dural closure, and skin closure; (5) postoperative heart rate and systolic blood pressure at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24-hour post procedure; (6) incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and; (7) incidence of nerve-block complications, namely scalp hematoma or inadvertent subarachnoid or intravascular injection of local anesthetic

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactProf Ajay Kumar Chaudhary

King Georges Medical University Lucknow

ajaychaudhary62@yahoo.com9415022374

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026