FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of pain removal efficacy of local anesthetic agents Lignocaine and Mepivacaine in children.

Comparative evaluation of mepivacaine vs lignocaine in pediatric population - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/086030
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-04-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Mepivacaine 3% without vasoconstrictor compared with 2% lignocaine: BP, pulse rate will be recorded before anesthesia, 5 minutes after anesthesia,15 minutes and 30 minutes after anesthe

Sponsors

Dr R Ahmed Dental College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Clinical signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in maxillary primary molar. - No visible swelling, sinus, mobility or pus discharge in relation with the affected tooth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Children with special health care needs. -Children with known allergies to local anesthetic agent -Children with evidence of any clinical swelling, sinus, mobility or pus discharge from affected tooth buccally or palatally - Teeth with external or internal resorption.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
blood pressure, heart rateTimepoint: before LA administration 5 minutes after LA 15 minutes after LA 30 minutes after LA—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain & anxiety perceptionTimepoint: 5 minutes, 15 minutes , 30 minutes after LA administration & after completion of procedure—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRachita Arora

Deptt. of Pedodontics

rachita.arora1@gmail.com9431342682

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026