Comparing whether real bone materials work better than lab made ones when placing dental implants right after a tooth is removed

comparative evaluation of autogenous graft versus alloplastic graft in immediate implant placement - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/085996

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Autogenous graft in immediate implant placement: Autogenous graft taken from symphysis menti region of the patient Control Intervention1: alloplastic graft in immediate implant placeme

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification (ASA) Grade I, II patients 2. Patient age between 18 years to 40 years 3. Good oral hygiene 4. Willingness to receive both autogenous and alloplastic grafts in the split-mouth design. 5. Willingness and availability for follow-up visits and assessments. 6. Individuals who have enough bone volume for implant placement (at least 5 mm of bone apically, as determined by CBCT), and with a jumping distance of less than 2 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Uncontrolled diseases that may impact implant healing. 2. Radiation history in the facial region. 3. Severe periodontal disease or active infection at implant sites 4. Insufficient oral hygiene or motivation to maintain oral health. 5. Pregnancy or Lactation 6. Known allergies or adverse reactions to the proposed graft materials.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The objective of our study is to compare autogenous graft versus alloplastic graft in immediate implant placement under the parameters like the amount of vertical bone loss.Timepoint: at baseline, 3rd month and 6th month.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The objective of our study is to compare autogenous graft versus alloplastic graft in immediate implant placement under the parameters like the post-operative pain, wound healing, mobility, implant stability, peri-implantitis.Timepoint: The post operative pain is assessed at 1st day, 3rd day, 5th day, 7th day. Mobility is evaluated at 3rd month, 6th month. Implant stability is assessed at baseline, 6th month. Peri-implantitis at 3rd month, 6th month. Wound healing 1st day, 3rd day, 5th day, 7th day.	—

Measure

Time frame

The objective of our study is to compare autogenous graft versus alloplastic graft in immediate implant placement under the parameters like the post-operative pain, wound healing, mobility, implant stability, peri-implantitis.Timepoint: The post operative pain is assessed at 1st day, 3rd day, 5th day, 7th day. Mobility is evaluated at 3rd month, 6th month. Implant stability is assessed at baseline, 6th month. Peri-implantitis at 3rd month, 6th month. Wound healing 1st day, 3rd day, 5th day, 7th day.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amit Gaur

Sardar Patel Postgraduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences

harshit.09870@gmail.com9672696052

Outcome results