Skip to content

Using Sticky Bone vs MTA to Treat Kids molars

Comparative Evaluation of Sticky Bone and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Pulpotomy agents in Primary Molars - A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085961
Enrollment
54
Registered
2025-04-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Sticky bone: Following coronal pulp removal, Sticky Bone is prepared by mixing autologous T-PRF (Titanium-Prepared Platelet-Rich Fibrin) with alloplastic bone graft material under steri

Sponsors

Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Presence of extensive caries has caused exposure of the pulp, but the tooth shows no signs of irreversible pulpitis or necrosis. 2. When the clinical and radiographic findings suggest that the inflammation is limited to the coronal pulp, and the radicular pulp is healthy. 3. The tooth should have sufficient structure to support a full coverage restoration after the pulpotomy procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Symptoms of spontaneous pain, lingering thermal pain, or severe pain unrelieved by analgesics. 2. Teeth nearing their natural exfoliation where retention is unnecessary. 3. Patients with systemic conditions (e.g., immunosuppression or bleeding disorders) where pulpotomy poses additional risks. 4. Inability of the patient to cooperate for the procedure, particularly in young children or individuals with special needs where alternative approaches may be more practical. 5. Presence of a sinus tract or swelling associated with the affected tooth. 6. Pathological mobility suggesting loss of bone support or extensive infection. 7. Prolonged bleeding /Failure to achieve hemostasis. 8. Presence of purulent discharge or a necrotic odor from the pulp chamber. 9. Presence of periapical or furcal radiolucency indicating radicular infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical success rate of pulpotomy using Sticky Bone vs. MTA in primary molars over a specified follow-up period (e.g., 3, 6, 9, 12 months). This includes absence of pain, swelling, mobility, sinus tract, or tenderness on percussion.Timepoint: Assessment will be done at 1, 3, 6, 9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic success rate of pulpotomy using Sticky Bone vs. MTA in primary molars. Parameters include absence of periapical/furcal radiolucency, internal/external root resorption, and maintenance of normal periodontal ligament space.Timepoint: Assessment will be done at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Yash Naik

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

drramakrishnay@gmail.com09769618111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026