Endodontic treatment outcome after using rotary vs reciprocating file system

Assessment of endodontic treatment outcome by using single rotary file vs single reciprocating file with single cone obturation: A randomized clinical trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/085949

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: WaveOne gold Dentsply reciprocating file system: This reciprocating file systems introduce a dynamic back-and-forth motion, enhancing safety and instrument longevity without compromisin

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Single rooted single canal mandibular premolars 2. Cases of apical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis 3. Patients with PAI score ranging from 1 to 3 4. Patients of all the genders aged 18 to 60 years 5. Patients without systemic diseases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Teeth with root caries cystic radiolucency calcified canals or resorption retreatment cases 2. Teeth with poor periodontal health 3. Patients with multimorbidity and pregnant patients 4. Patients with lack of compliance 5. Patients who consumed analgesics before 12 to 24 hrs prior to the root canal treatment and 24 hrs after treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The expected outcome of the study could provide valuable insights into the efficiency of rotary and reciprocating file system and their effect on microbial count, postoperative pain. If one treatment option demonstrates superior clinical and radiographic outcome by choosing the more successful treatment option dental professionals can potentially reduce the need for more time taking technique and ease the operation for clinicians and comfort level of patients as wellTimepoint: At 4hrs 8hrs 12hrs 24hrs and 48hrs and 1week intervals	—

Measure

Time frame

The expected outcome of the study could provide valuable insights into the efficiency of rotary and reciprocating file system and their effect on microbial count, postoperative pain. If one treatment option demonstrates superior clinical and radiographic outcome by choosing the more successful treatment option dental professionals can potentially reduce the need for more time taking technique and ease the operation for clinicians and comfort level of patients as wellTimepoint: At 4hrs 8hrs 12hrs 24hrs and 48hrs and 1week intervals

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The expected outcome of the study could provide valuable insights into the efficiency of rotary and reciprocating file system and their effect on The expected outcome of the study could provide valuable insights into the efficiency of rotary and reciprocating file system and their effect on apical healing Timepoint: 6 Months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pranjali Babre

Professor at SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik

draab.endo@gmail.com9766787431

Outcome results