comparison and evaluation of the upper jaw air cavity lift for screw placement with surgical approach using hollow drill with manual tool versus special drills

Comparative evaluation of transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation for implant placement using trephine with osteotome versus densah burs - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/085824

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-28

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Trephine with osteotome: Transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation using trephine with osteotome Control Intervention1: Densah burs: transcrestal maxillary sinus augmentation using dens

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Systemically healthy patients Cooperative patients Patients with one or more missing teeth in the posterior region of maxilla requiring sinus floor elevation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Sinusitis patients Patients with adverse habits like smoking alcohol consumption pregnant or lactating women allergy or hypersensitivity to the materials used mental or physical disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
to estimate the amount of sinus elevation achieved and bone height gainTimepoint: Baseline and after 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Surinder Sachdeva

MMCDSR

sksperio@gmail.com9017580802

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026