A Comparative Evaluation Between Baska Mask AND I-gel Supraglottic Airway Devices In Patients Undergoing Surgery Under General Anaesthesia

A Comparative Evaluation Between Baska Mask AND I-gel For Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure In Patients Undergoing Surgery Under General Anesthesia- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/085822

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-28

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis Health Condition 2: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Inserting BASKA mask device for General Anaesthesia: Comparing BASKA mask with Igel for patient undergoing general anaesthesia for oropharyngeal leak pressure, ease of insertion, attemp

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Written and informed consent 2. Weight between 40-80 kg 3. ASA Grade 1 and 2 patients 4. All MP Grades 5. Patents planned for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Any pathology of oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device or mouth openings less than 2.5 cm Expected duration of surgery longer than 2 hours 3. Potential full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia) 4. Lack of consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Oropharyngeal Leak PressureTimepoint: Leak Pressure will be noted immediately following mask insertion and 10 min of surgery at which equilibrium will be reached	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Comparison of ease of insertion. 2.Comparison in attempts to insert the device. 3.Overall success rate. 4.Comparison of position with fiberoptic laryngoscope. 5.Comparison of hemodynamic changes. 6.Comparison of post-insertion complication.Timepoint: number of attempts(1 or 2), POGO score(100%,50%,0%), To measure changes in heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and oxygen saturation( pre induction, post intubation, and and after 3 minutes and 5 minutes)	—

Measure

Time frame

1.Comparison of ease of insertion. 2.Comparison in attempts to insert the device. 3.Overall success rate. 4.Comparison of position with fiberoptic laryngoscope. 5.Comparison of hemodynamic changes. 6.Comparison of post-insertion complication.Timepoint: number of attempts(1 or 2), POGO score(100%,50%,0%), To measure changes in heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and oxygen saturation( pre induction, post intubation, and and after 3 minutes and 5 minutes)

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMd Parwez Alam

DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MEDICAL COLLEGE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH

hussainamir77@gmail.com09897559183

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026