FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of non channeled video laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal tube

A randomized study to compare non channeled video laryngoscope versus McCoy laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal tube in cardio thoracic surgeries at Sawai Man Singh Medical College Jaipur - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085749
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-04-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

SMS Medical College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are scheduled for double lumen endotracheal tube intubation for one lung ventilation 2. Patients giving informed written consent 3. Patients of either gender of age 18 to 60 4. Patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists ASA Class I,II and III 5. Patients with Malmapatti Grading I and II, Thyromental distance more than 6.5cm and inter incisor distance more than 3 fingers breadth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with Anticipated difficult airway 2. Patients with Bilateral lung disease 3. Patients with cervical spine instability 4. Body mass index more than 35 kg per m2 5. Patients with history of difficult or failed intubation 6. Patients having tracheal compression or tracheomalacia or tracheal stenosis 7. Patients should not be a part of any other study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To determine the proportion of cases with different Modified Cormack Lehane Grading for view of glottis opening during double lumen endotracheal tube intubation in both the groups 2. To assess and compare the mean time to intubation needed in both the groups 3. To assess and compare the ease of laryngoscopy in both the groups 4. To assess and compare the ease of tube advancement. in both the groups 5. To assess and compare the intubation difficulty score in both the groupsTimepoint: Monitoring vitals at 0, just after intubation, 3,5,10,15,30,60,120 minutes and just after extubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To assess and compare the mean SBP, mean DBP, mean arterial pressure, mean heart rate, mean spO2 in both the groups at defined time intervals 2. To assess and compare the proportion of complications if any in both the groupsTimepoint: Monitoring vitals at 0, just after intubation, 3,5,10,15,30,60,120 minutes and just after extubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR Suman Sudha

SMS Medical College, Jaipur

archveer.ss@gmail.com8890160492

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026