Skip to content

Comparison of Two Methods of Activated PRP Preparation for Endometrial Regeneration: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial

Study of Two Methods of Activated PRP Preparation with Growth Factor Characterization for Endometrial Regeneration: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Comparative, Non-Inferiority Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085687
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-04-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N979- Female infertility, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: PRP: Peripheral blood (30 50 mL) is collected from the patient into tubes containing an anticoagulant (e.g., ACD) and centrifuged to separate plasma from red blood cells and the buffy c

Sponsors

Aruna R
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A history of RIF (greater than or equal to 3 failed implantation attempts). A history of RPL (greater than or equal to 2 consecutive miscarriages). Diagnosed thin endometrium (less than 7 mm) in preparation for embryo transfer. Willingness to undergo PRP therapy. Signed informed consent. Endometrial Biopsy done and noted to not have Tuberculosis or Chronic Endometritis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Active infection or untreated pelvic inflammatory disease. Uterine abnormalities like fibroids or adhesions not amenable to treatment. Systemic conditions that contraindicate PRP therapy. Use of anticoagulant therapy or blood disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the effect of two methods of PRP preparation on endometrial thickness and vascularity in patients with thin endometrium and its subsequent impact on implantation and pregnancy rates. Timepoint: 6 weeks of pregnancy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assess the role of PRP in improving pregnancy outcomes, measured as ongoing pregnancy rate ( OPR ) in patients with thin endometrium. Comparison of Platelet count, cytokines and growth factors in in-house activated PRP versus Tricell aPRP preparation Timepoint: 6 weeks of pregnancy

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aruna R
aruna@a4fertility.com09841269578

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026